Read it before shooting nonsense. watch the pictures.
Do not blame it for nothing.
Do not always do the gossip that looks for the hair on the egg, do not turn the phrases and their meaning. “I do not understand the current system” means why? that such a system, which I understand very well and explained in detail in the presentation, is applied to this game.
I invite you to re-read this:
this is the problem
Because I’m tired of repeating, if you do not believe me or do not want to believe I do not care.
At this stage when you lose, even with a rank 2, you lose maximum 50-100 positions.
At this stage when you lose, you lose 500 - 1000 - 2000 positions every single game. That is the same from level 2 or from a top player of the top 3 clan.
- THE PROBLEM IS NOT THE PLAYER WEAKER OR STRONGER. THIS GAME HAVE AN OTHER PROBLEM.
- READ OUT THAT POST SUBJECT: POINT 3 ( 3) Different conquest or loss of position based on the opponent.)
You can express your idea, as I express and justify my.
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEES, YEEEEESSSSS, we’re just saying that this is not a right system!
I repeat point 3 :
3) Different conquest or loss of position based on the opponent.
Even this is something that makes no sense.
For example, if the top ranked team loses with the last team in the standings, it is no longer losing more than losing with the second ranked. It’s the same. So winning a match with the first of the championship or the last, does not change anything. It’s always and only a game won or a game lost.
The other discourse is just your opinion that is opposed to mine.
In the end if one does not have a good mech, does not win and then, what are we discussing?
Certainly, it is rewarded for those who play more but also wins more.
Do we want to stimulate those who play little?
You do not read to understand, please read the post and the various answers.
I know you’re doing something to ruin and close the post, so I will never answer your provocations again. For me you and what you are screaming no longer exist.