I do not understand your problem.
I answer you now and it’s enough because I do not want to turn the theme into a bump.
Your answer shows two things, one: your passion for this game, two the size of your person. So, with your answer, I’m not me that losing points.
I know that the ideas put into this session “ideas and features”, will not change the game. But since they created this session, instead of you, I translate my passion for this game by bringing ideas.
An idea then, may or may not pleasure.
And it is not necessary to have everyone the same idea.
You say this game is fine and I say this game can be improved.
The funny thing that while we’re discussing this is a team of 27 players, though the limit is 24.
In addition, the term casino, has been used to indicate “sarcastically” the unmanageable component of the game. The component lagged to luck, or call it as you want.
There are two thoughts in the discussion, who says: No, the out-of-control component is fine, and who, like me, wants more control over the game. This is all and is very simple.
I believe that this game would be better by lowering or removing the component out of control of this game: The range of damage of the weapons.
You think how you want, but you do not feel obliged to intervene.